05 January 2009

05 January 2009 - Obama does not support Israel in Gaza

Despite the best hopes for president-elect Obama's administration--and though I supported McCain, I wish him well--it is clear he does not support Israel in its fight against Hamas in Gaza. Israel's opponents wish he would be outspoken about his opposition. Nonetheless, his silence is deafening.

Obama's given excuse--that there is "one president at a time"--would not matter if he agreed with President Bush, who has fully supported Israel. Many other leading U.S. politicians from both parties have spoken out (as did Obama, on the campaign trail). They have spoken with one voice, in support of Israel.

The only way America could appear to have two presidents at once is if Obama openly disagreed with Bush, separating himself from the broad American consensus in support of Israel's right of self-defense. He has certainly spoken out on other issues on which he wanted to draw a contrast with the status quo.

His reluctance to speak on the Gaza War indicates that he does disagree, at least in part, with Bush and with Israel. He doesn't want to provoke the stiff opposition that open condemnation of Israel would invite. But I expect he will express his true feelings once he has the reins of power.

Ironically, Obama's coyness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict--studded with contradictions, and abetted by media cover-ups such as the Khalidi affair--may have encouraged Israel to respond to Hamas now, before Obama takes office, in order to avoid disagreement with the new U.S. administration.

4 Comments:

At 11:26 AM, Anonymous an israeli said...

As a supporter of the operation in Gaza, it seems like you should welcome Obama's silence. If he indeed disapproves of the operation, this gives Israel breathing room to operate at least until January 20.

What you say does not make sense:
"The only way America could appear to have two presidents at once is if Obama openly disagreed with Bush..."

If that's correct, and if Obama is silent, then it follows that he agrees with Bush and tacitly supports Israel's actions.

Either way, you have no cause for complaint.

 
At 11:31 AM, Blogger Joel said...

Well, for once, I hope you are right!

 
At 5:25 PM, Blogger Krishna109 said...

If he opposes Israel's right to self-defense-- then he is opening himself up to charges of extreme hypocracy. See, for example:
1. Message to the people of Sderot, Israel...or
2. Barack Obama visits Sderot,
Israel
.

By making statements such as these-- either he changes his position after inauguration and looks likes a hypocrite-- or continues to make statements such as these and really piss off some of his supporters.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out...

 
At 5:25 PM, Blogger Krishna109 said...

If he opposes Israel's right to self-defense-- then he is opening himself up to charges of extreme hypocracy. See, for example:
1. Message to the people of Sderot, Israel...or
2. Barack Obama visits Sderot,
Israel
.

By making statements such as these-- either he changes his position after inauguration and looks likes a hypocrite-- or continues to make statements such as these and really piss off some of his supporters.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out...

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home